Close

San Francisco Criminal Lawyer Blog

Updated:

Court of Appeal rules that lawful possession of marijuana does not provide probable cause to search a vehicle

People v. Hall (Cal. Ct. App., Nov. 24, 2020, No. A157868) 2020 WL 6882240, at *1–7 Facts:  When Hall was pulled over for a vehicle-equipment violation in 2018, a San Francisco police officer observed in the car “a clear plastic baggie” of what appeared to be marijuana. Police officers the.…

Updated:

Conduct credits earned in CDCR cannot be applied to reduce a prisoner’s nonviolent parole eligible date (Prop. 57)

In re Canady (Cal. Ct. App., Nov. 25, 2020, No. C089363) 2020 WL 6938325, at *1–3  Summary: Canady filed a writ of habeas corpus in the superior court seeking early parole consideration under Proposition 57, also known as the Public Safety and Rehabilitation Act of 2016 (Prop. 57). Canady asserted…

Updated:

Grand theft conviction reduced to petty theft based on fair market value of merchandise

People v. Grant (Cal. Ct. App., Nov. 12, 2020, No. D076576) 2020 WL 6608321, at *1  Summary: Kenneth Grant  stole merchandise from a Wilsons Leather outlet store where everything is sold at a discount, determined by applying varying discount percentages to a “comparable value” the store displays on tags attached…

Updated:

Court Of Appeal Finds Mentally Ill Defendant Received Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Comments on over-incarceration of mentally ilL

People V. O’Hearn (Cal. Ct. App., Nov. 9, 2020, No. A158676) 2020 WL 6556592, at *1–2 Patrick Sean O’Hearn appealed from the denial of his motion to vacate a guilty plea to charges of making a criminal threat. The Court of Appeal held that O’Hearn received ineffective assistance of counsel…

Updated:

Penal Code 1170.94 did not abolish implied malice for a DUI Murder

People v. Roldan (Cal. Ct. App., Oct. 30, 2020, No. B298570) 2020 WL 6375578, at *1 Summary: Marlon Roldan was convicted of second degree murder under an implied malice theory for killing a person while driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). He filed a petition in the superior court…

Updated:

San Quentin Prison acted with deliberate indifference, failing to protect inmates from COVID-19

In re Von Staich (Cal. Ct. App., Oct. 20, 2020, No. A160122) 2020 WL 6144780, at *1–2 Petition claiming San Quentin does not adequately protect against COVID-19 infection  Ivan Von Staich, incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison,serving a sentence of 17 years to life for a second degree  murder consecutive…

Updated:

Veterans with military related trauma  eligible for resentencing if sentenced before January 1,2015

People v. Valliant (Cal. Ct. App., Oct. 14, 2020, No. G058568) 2020 WL 6054332, at *1–6 Summary: Valliant petitioned pursuant to Penal Code section 1170.91, subdivision (b),1  which authorizes  recall of sentencing for military veterans who suffer from military-related trauma and substance abuse, who did not have those factors considered…

Updated:

Re-sentencing under 1170(d)-limits to court’s authority

Court discretion under 1170(d)  Penal Code section 1170(d)(1) states: “The court resentencing under this paragraph may reduce a defendant’s term of imprisonment and modify the judgment, including a judgment entered after a plea agreement, if it is in the interest of justice.”  (Pen. Code, § 1170(d)(1)) Does the court’s authority…

Contact Us